Administrative Questions
What's going to happen to CyberTutor?
I'm afraid I really have no idea!
What else is there to learn after RLC circuits?
Before the quiz, we'll be talking about electromagnetic waves,
and Maxwell's equations. There are a few more topics after the quiz.
What are we going to do in class after next Wednesday's
test, since there is no final?
We will be covering a few more topics, mostly to do with wave
phenomena: interference, diffraction, scattering. Also
there will still be the microwave experiment to do.
Content Questions
How do you know how to solve differential equations if you're not
in 18.03?
Well, I guess the best thing to do is to learn by example. There are
really only a few basic ones to know. The basic procedure is
to ``separate variables'': get the variable you want to solve
for as a function of the other on one side of the equation. Then
integrate from the start to the point where you're trying to
find the solution (see the first practice problem from today,
for example.).
In the first practice problem, why does
have more
current? Shouldn't it have less if it opposes the change in current
more?
Whether it has more or less current depends on whether the current is
increasing or decreasing. In this particular case, the current is
decreasing.
opposes the change more, so it slows the
decrease more. Since it slows the decrease more, the current
will go to zero more slowly- so
will have more current at any
given time.
When doing the Loop Rule in an R/L/C problem, how do you
choose the sign for the potential difference across the capacitor? How
was this sign chosen for the second practice problem? How about the sign for the inductor term?
The signs are a little tricky. The best way to keep them
straight is to draw a careful picture following the
instructions of the R/L/C How-To: draw the
directions of currents and the signs of charges on the capacitor plates,
choosing directions and signs consistently if not specified in the
problem.
For instance, in the LC practice problem, you could draw the top plate as
and
the bottom plate as
. When the switch
is closed, charge leaves the top plate, so direction of current is CCW.
The sign of the
inductor's
is
(walking around the loop
CCW, and minus sign since walking in the direction of the current). The
minus sign means that if
is negative (decreasing), the induced
emf is positive and vice versa. Walking around CCW from the
plate
to the
one is an increase in potential, so you get
. The D.E.
is
. But now we want to relate
and
. When
charge is leaving the top plate,
is decreasing. So
is positive
(CCW) when
is negative. So we then put in
, to get
.
(You would get the same equation if you initially picked plate charge
signs and directions the opposite way... in fact in this particular
example, the charge oscillates back and forth, and so both situations
- top plate positive and CCW current, or bottom plate positive and CW
current - actually happen).
In the second practice problem, when the charge oscillates back
and forth, does it produce a spark?
No, the charge just sloshes back and forth. If it sparked across the capacitor,
that would discharge the circuit (at least partially) and oscillations
might stop.
What exactly do you mean by a ``steady-state situation''?
``Steady-state'' generally means a situation in which the current
does not change. If there's an AC power supply, it's not steady
state, since the power supply is driving the current back and forth
and there's in general a non-zero
at any given time. However, for
a DC power supply (which provides constant voltage), the situation
may or may not be steady state. There may be a ``transient'' situation,
for which there's current changing over a short period of time, but
after a long time the situation will settle to a steady state. An
example would be closing or opening a switch to add or remove a battery:
current may initially change, but then reach a final ``steady-state''
value after a long time, or go to zero, depending on the situation.
What would happen with a constant DC voltage? Is that a steady state?
It may be or not, depending on the situation. As mentioned above, you can
have a ``transient'' situation with a DC voltage, for which
the situation isn't steady until it's settled down after a long time.
Is there a table of formulas you could use for RL, RC, RLC, etc?
Well, you could write one up, but there are really a lot
of possible situations and IMO this is not so useful. It's really simpler
to just know the rules for writing the differential equation
you need to solve (see the R/L/C How-To).
Where does the mechanical analogy come from? Why are
the variables analogous to each other?
It comes from the fact that the same math describes the behavior
of a mechanical system and of an electrical system. You can
see that the variables (e.g.
for
and so on) are analogous, just
by substituting them. The equation is the same,
just different variable names - so the solutions for each
case must show the same behavior.
What is the meaning of
?
The physical meaning is ``sensitivity of EMF to change in current''.
A big self-inductance means a big induced EMF for a given change in
current in the coil; a small
means a small induced EMF for the
same change in current. In the mechanical analogy,
is like mass.
It provides a sort of ``electrical inertia''. If you imagine a mass
with some force applied to it, the bigger the mass, the harder it is for a
given force to accelerate it. Similarly, the bigger the
, the
harder it is for a given EMF to change the current through it.
Will we see examples where a voltage source is present in
an R/L/C circuit?
Yes, you will see transient examples where a DC voltage is applied
(like your CyberTutor problems this week). You've already seen
RLC examples where a sinusoidal voltage source is present.
In the demo in class on Monday, why did the brightness of
the light bulb change when the iron rod was moved in
and out of the inductor?
Prof. Roland showed in class how the current of an RLC circuit
depends on frequency. There's a big peak in the current versus frequency plot
at what's called the ``resonance frequency'', where
. This happens when the ``driving frequency''
of
the power supply equals the ``natural frequency''
of the RLC circuit.
This phenomenon is called resonance, and the mechanical
analogy is: imagine shaking a slinky back and forth. If you push it
back and forth at just the same frequency that it would naturally
oscillate at, you can make it oscillate with very big amplitude. Other
analogies: pushing a child on a swing at just the right frequency to
make her swing really high, and the swinging ball demo from class.
What Prof. Roland was doing with the inductor was actually not
changing
, but changing the
so that the resonant frequency
changed. When this resonant frequency became equal to the frequency
of the AC power supply, the current peaked and the bulb burned brightly.
See section 31-6 in your text, and figure 31-9; I'll try to go over this
in recitation if we have time.
Does the Hall effect say that electrons move in a circuit?
The Hall effect is described in Section 27-8 of your text. It
causes separation of
charges perpendicular to the direction of current in a wire in a magnetic
field (due to the Lorentz force on the moving charges.) We will neglect
this in most of our discussions.
Can you give us some hints about the last problem on the pset?
I think this one will become more clear once we cover displacement
current in class.
Can you explain Experiment AMP?
I've had the most requests for this, so I'll cover it in detail
on Thursday.
Can you explain AC circuits?
I've also had a lot of requests for this. We may not have too
much time left on Thursday, so I've posted an AC Equation
Summary
which I hope will help.
I'll try to go over some things Tuesday, too.
Can you help on CyberTutor?
Yes, but please be specific about which problems are causing
you the most trouble, since there are
a lot of problems.
In the first CT problem for points, it asks for the current
immediately after the circuit is closed. The textbook says
a current immediately starts to flow, but why does CT say it's zero?
Current does immediately start to flow. But it starts from
zero at
immediately after the switch is closed, and
increases from there.
In the first CT problem for points, second part, part D, I'm
sure the answer is 0.0575. Why does CT say it's .0576?
I think this is a round-off problem. When you do the calculation,
try keeping more significant digits all the way through
the intermediate steps. I get 5756 seconds for part d, which rounds to 5760
with 3 significant figures.
Tidbits