Next: About this document ...
How To Find the Electric Field
for a
Continuous Distribution of Charges
For a continuous distribution of charge, it's really the same thing
as for point charges,
except that you treat the continuous distribution as if it is a bunch
of infinitesimally small point charges added together.
So the total field at
,
which is the sum of fields due to each piece
,
,
becomes an integral
.
To actually calculate this integral, the trick is to convert
into some quantity you can integrate over.
- Identify the spot
where you want to find the field.
- Mentally divide the continuous charge distribution up
into a bunch of tiny pieces which are equivalent to point
charges. Exactly how to do this depends on the shape
of the object. For example, if you have a line charge, cut
it up into little pieces
along the line.
- For each piece
, draw the vector
at
which is the contribution to the
electric field
due to
, remembering that direction of
is away
from positive charges and towards negative ones.
When considering the field due to
, ignore the presence
of any other charges.
- Find the magnitude of this contribution to
the field at
:
,
where
is the distance from the source charge
to
the spot
you're at.
- Decompose the fields
into components in your chosen coordinate system.
- Now add the fields
vectorially, i.e. add
up the
,
and
components. Note that
you can often use symmetry to simplify your answer (for example,
for an infinite line charge, components parallel to the line cancel).
The sum in a particular direction
will be an integral of the type
.
- To evaluate this integral, you need to convert
into
some space coordinate you can integrate over, using what you know
about the charge density distribution. For example:
if you have a uniform line charge,
, where
is the line charge density (charge per unit length).
- Substitute the relation between charge and space coordinate
into the integral, and crank it through to get the total field.
An example of a problem which can be approached in this way
is pset #2 problem 2.
Next: About this document ...
2003-02-23